[aur-general] chromium packages

Jeff Horelick jdhore1 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 21 16:39:44 EDT 2009

Apparently, no you did not. I maintained the chromium-snapshot package and I
haven't got any mail from anyone related to the package in the past 24
hours. I know my email is correct in my AUR account as I recieve out-of-date
notifications and comment notifications just fine.

2009/10/21 Biru Ionut <biru.ionut at gmail.com>

> On 10/21/2009 02:23 AM, Panos Filip wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Biru Ionut<biru.ionut at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>  HI,
>>> i'm opening this subject again. sorry for that.
>>> i want to delete them tonight and i want to ask you guys which is the
>>> best
>>> package to have(and renamed) conform this proposal:
>>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Chromium_proposal
>>> chromium-browser-svn  will not be deleted.
>>> chromium-bin i can't choose one from that list because i don't know which
>>> one is good. just tell me which one and i'll email the maintainer to
>>> upload
>>> with a different name.
>>> --
>>> Ionut
>> I think that the best is:
>> 1) ONE chromium-browser-bin-latest, because -latest- will make clear that
>> it
>> isn't a stabilized or stable release and it will download the ... latest.
>> The one that Stefan Husmann suggests is the best I suppose. And it should
>> be
>> the zip from googlebot. It's the (2) (the svn build) in zip.
>> 2) ONE chromium-browser-svn : it exists. No problem. It can be built
>> succesfully on x86_32 and x86_64.
> i've deleted all packages. Now we have only two packages:
> chromium-browser-bin
> chromium-browser-svn
> Email sent to all maintainers explaining why i did that. Hope that they
> understand and doesn't upload any chromium packages.
> --
> Ionut

More information about the aur-general mailing list