[aur-general] Packaging LLVM

Ranguvar ranguvar at archlinux.us
Mon Oct 26 20:06:22 EDT 2009

Just did a build with and without Clang.  The difference comes out to about
12MiB, actually -- 69MiB for LLVM, and 81MiB for LLVM+Clang.
12MiB is, incidentally, the size of the /usr/libexec/clang-cc file you
mentioned, so that's basically all the size difference.

Attached is a PKGBUILD which builds LLVM+Clang, comment out the mv line from
build() to build only LLVM.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Ranguvar <ranguvar at archlinux.us> wrote:

> Sorry, no idea what you're talking about in that first paragraph?
> Where is the PKGBUILD?  And what do you mean by scan-* wrappers?
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Tobias Kieslich <tobias at justdreams.de>wrote:
>> Thanks,
>> I posted my llvm-clang-svn PKGBUILD in AUR, not all of the things made
>> it into the actual build. I like to have all scan-* wrappers included as
>> they are handy and depend on each other (scan-build -V invokes
>> scan-view automatically after a test build). They PKGBUILD is in the
>> comments of the package.
>> If you look at the llvm binaries provided you'll see the clang package
>> is bigger than the gcc stuff. However, the way they package it makes me
>> think it might be trick to separate clang from llvm but it sure is worth
>> a try.
>>        -T
>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Ranguvar wrote:
>> > Very well, I'll make a prototype PKGBUILD that has sections for each
>> install
>> > and then post it here, good luck :)
>> >
>> > I do think it odd though that Clang would be larger than GCC, I guess
>> we'll
>> > have to see.
>> >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20091026/8003031f/attachment-0001.obj>

More information about the aur-general mailing list