[aur-general] Deletion request for rasqal in [AUR]
stefan-husmann at t-online.de
Sat Sep 5 08:27:04 EDT 2009
hollunder at gmx.at schrieb:
> An upstream change required rasqal to be moved to [extra] so redland
> can provide the same functionality. I don't see a point in keeping the
> [AUR] version. The maintainer wasn't particularly responsive either.
> Thanks to AndyRTR for resolving the issue swiftly.
Thank you, deleted.
More information about the aur-general