[aur-general] Quality

[Magnus Therning]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:44, Nathan O <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not meaning a specific package, it could be a random package(s)

Huh?

I quote your email here:

  Hey I was wondering if somebody has time to look at my packages and see if
  they are of quality :)

So, what packages should I choose randomly from?

/M

> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Magnus Therning <magnus at therning.org>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 07:00, Nathan O <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hey I was wondering if somebody has time to look at my packages and see if
>>> they are of quality :) Some I adopted and got to add my name and email as
>>> maintainer and update the quality of it. The ones with my name and email
>>> are already updated. If you look you may see ndowens04 at gmail dot com or
>>> ndowens04+AUR at gmail dot com I may end up adding this email to the
>>> packages, I created this email address for AUR purposes so my main email
>>> address doesn't get cluttered.
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand what you wrote above, but wouldn't it
>> improve your chances of help if you actually listed the packages in
>> question instead?
>>
>> /M
>>
>> --
>> Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
>> magnus＠therning．org          Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
>> http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe
>>
>



-- 
Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org          Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe