ndowens.aur at gmail.com
Sun Aug 29 03:11:40 EDT 2010
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Nathan O <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Nathan O <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should libicq2000 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337 be
>> deleted, the package gives that it can't find libsigc++ though it is
>> installed. I did some research and it is said that libicq2000 will not work
>> with the libsigc++-2. I am thinking that you are not able to install
>> libsigc++ and libsigc++-2. If it is to be deleted, package ickle
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11336 should be deleted because
>> it depends on libicq2000. Not sure what to do in this aspect.
> Or the better question may be, can libsigc++-2 and libsigc++ be "friendly"
> together? I am betting no, but if it can then it wouldn't need to be
> deleted(the above mention packages)
Just noticed, seems that libsigcplusplus is the same as libsigcpp1.2
More information about the aur-general