[aur-general] libicq2000

[Nathan O]

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Rémy Oudompheng <remy at archlinux.org> wrote:

> Nathan O wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Nathan O
> > <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Should libicq2000 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337 be
> >> deleted, the package gives that it can't find libsigc++ though it is
> >> installed. I did some research and it is said that libicq2000 will not
> >> work with the libsigc++-2. I am thinking that you are not able to
> install
> >> libsigc++ and libsigc++-2. If it is to be deleted, package ickle
> >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11336 should be deleted
> because
> >> it depends on libicq2000. Not sure what to do in this aspect.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> > Or the better question may be, can libsigc++-2 and libsigc++ be
> "friendly"
> > together? I am betting no, but if it can then it wouldn't need to be
> > deleted(the above mention packages)
>
> You should be able to have both without problem, that's why they have
> different names (just like gtk 1/2/3).
>
> --
> Rémy.
>
> Ok just wanted to make sure. I think libsigcplusplus
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11338  should be deleted, it seems
that http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11336 is the same