[aur-general] TU Application: Dave Reisner
schiv at archlinux.org
Thu Dec 2 16:51:14 CET 2010
On 2 December 2010 23:39, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy at gmail.com> wrote:
> In light of this new discussion however, I feel like the proper policy is to
> name a package without a suffix if there is a 'versioned release', no matter
> where this comes from (source tarball, vcs tag, etc.). Then the converse is
> that if a package has *no release* but just a rolling development trunk,
> then it is given a suffix. --Kaiting.
Yeah, that's a better outline. You could include that in the wiki.
More information about the aur-general