[aur-general] TU Application: Dave Reisner
girard.cedric at gmail.com
Thu Dec 2 17:13:56 CET 2010
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
> Packages that are built from vcs but which are based on some form of
> "release" should not include the tag in the package name.
> I think the simplest rule of thumb would be that if the same PKGBUILD
> different binary packages depending on when makepkg was run, then it should
> include the suffix in the name.
These two rules are not the same. For instance the package xbmc-svn  is
based on fixed svn version that does not corresponds to any "release"
upstream. It is just tested svn revisions (by the packager) as not every
revisions are usable.
More information about the aur-general