[aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

[Ionuț Bîru]

On 12/05/2010 12:07 AM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sat 04 Dec 2010 23:59 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>> On 12/04/2010 11:53 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>> On 5 December 2010 05:46, Loui Chang<louipc.ist at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>> On Sat 04 Dec 2010 22:19 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>>>>> On 12/03/2010 12:06 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i don't see this being discuss any further and all messages have been only
>>>>> in one direction.
>>>>>
>>>>> i modified his account on aur to normal user. Ranguvar, i'm sorry for this
>>>>> and when you'll have time again you should consider applying again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Loui can you disable his account on sigurd?
>>>>> Andrea can you remove his privileges from bugtracker and forum?
>>>>
>>>> You still need to create a voting proposal.
>>>> Why doesn't anyone read the damned bylaws?
>>>
>>> I myself thought there would be voting, but I just realised Ionut
>>> inferred that we needn't vote from the following:
>>>
>>> "for which standard voting procedure deviates from the above."
>>>
>>
>> above being the voting procedure and from my understanding what is the
>> opposite of having a voting? NO voting.
>>
>>
>> we had this situation in the past and we didn't had any voting procedure. we
>> just removed it and we continued our business.
>>
>> with or without the vote, the result would be the same. And to be fair, we
>> are investing too much time in the removal, even more that he invested in
>> community.
>
> Then don't waste any time on it. Leave it alone.
> But if you do want to remove a Trusted User you MUST follow the bylaws.
> Three days discussion and Five days of voting for removal due to
> inactivity. Read the bloody bylaws.
>

maybe i lack the understanding of words and to quote from bylaws:

"The removal of a Trusted User may also occur at any time.

A motion must be made by at least two active Trusted Users for the 
removal of a Trusted User. (THIS IS ME)
Following the motion, standard voting procedure commences with a 
discussion period of 7 days.

There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted and 
undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure deviates from 
the above."


OK SEE?

Care to explain what's the procedure for the special case? Clearly is 
not voting procedure is something else.

-- 
Ionuț