[aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar take 2

[Thomas Dziedzic]

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Christopher Brannon
<chris at the-brannons.com> wrote:
> Ionuț Bîru <ibiru at archlinux.org> writes:
>
>> 2) no commits in community since the addition.
>>
>> 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this deviates from
>> the "above", above being, 5 days discussion period + 7 voting. Because
>> of that i'm starting a 3 days discussion period and 5 days voting.
>
> If he had ever been active, I would probably vote against the proposal.
> I hate to see this sort of thing.  Unfortunately, Ranguvar has been AWOL
> since he was elected.  Removal seems appropriate.
>
> Ranguvar, you have my best wishes.
>
> -- Chris
>

I also vote for removal.

"Gentlemen, we can rebuild him. We have the technology."