louipc.ist at gmail.com
Sun Dec 5 12:20:06 EST 2010
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 11:53 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Shacristo <shacristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > One of the stated purposes of the quorum is to "ensure that TUs remain
> > active in the job that they have taken on." Allowing circumvention of
> > the quorum requirements will obviously undermine that.
> TU's have a lot of different responsibilities. Prolonging a decided vote by
> six days to motivate or ensure that someone is active does not make sense to
> me. --Kaiting.
I would propose shortening the voting period then. I kind of like how
the system is set up (not perfectly though) to remove the inactive TUs
More information about the aur-general