[aur-general] Non-native English speakers and the AUR by-laws [WAS: removal proposal for Ranguvar]
abi1789 at googlemail.com
Sun Dec 5 21:18:00 CET 2010
On 12/05/2010 08:43 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sun 05 Dec 2010 13:47 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
>> That's the correct interpretation. A simple majority requires *greater* than
>> 50% of the votes cast which is what the part up above was trying to express.
> "Did more than 50% of the votes cast for YES?"
> should be changed to:
> "Are the number of YES votes greater than the number of NO votes?"
> Remember abstained votes don't count as votes.
Ok, I changed that.
The bylaws should probably more specific about the definition of
Maybe one could replace the following:
"A simple majority is needed to pass or reject the motion. In the event
of a draw, being that 50% is not a majority, the motion does not pass."
"For the motion to pass, the number of YES votes has to be greater than
the number of NO votes."
freenode/pyropeter "12:50 - Ich drücke Return."
More information about the aur-general