[aur-general] Tarball Guidelines
louipc.ist at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 21:06:10 EST 2010
On Mon 06 Dec 2010 10:59 +0100, Nicky726 wrote:
> been told by the bot, that selinux-flex has a binary (selinux-flex/flex-
> arch.patch.gz), which is a gziped patch. Guess I can ungzip it, though as this
> package is just a copy of a [core] package from some time ago, I guess the
> original maintainers new, what they were doing, if they included it this way.
> So should I do it to not include evil gziped patches?
It would be best to avoid. It would be preferable to have the patch
incorporated upstream if possible.
More information about the aur-general