[aur-general] [PATCH] tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure
kaitocracy at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 23:08:34 EST 2010
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Thorsten Töpper
<atsutane at freethoughts.de>wrote:
> So far it is mostly fine for me, however from this paragraph it is not
> clear if the vote is still open when the quorum was reached and the
> application passed. In my opinion it should be, so everyone has the
> chance to do a vote and express his way though it doesn't matter.
> (Yes it does not make any formal sense, however I think about human
> emotions that it's better to do so, so no one feels to be excluded
> just as the vote is another in a row where he/she could not
> participate. In other words: Kaiting that was what I meant yesterday.)
I'm not really one for human emotion, but I'll go ahead and conceded to a
full voting period regardless of whether or not a vote is set.
I've read through this a couple more times and I'm little concerned about
the particular wording. Unfortunately I don't know how to make this any
clearer so I guess I'll shut up...
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
More information about the aur-general