[aur-general] [PATCH] tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure

[Kaiting Chen]

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:

> > I sent the proposed patch to some people who deal with this kind of thing
> > and most of them were confused until I explained it thoroughly. I'm
> waiting
> > to hear their suggestions. --Kaiting.
>
> Wow. I didn't think it was that bad.
>

The wording could use some work. The biggest question I've been getting is
"how long is the discussion period between the first and second vote if the
quorum fails?". The answer is of course zero, but apparently this is very
unorthodox.

Also it seems the people are confused by the difference between 'not
accepted' and 'rejected', which to my understanding there is none.
--Kaiting.

-- 
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/