[aur-general] [PATCH] tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure
louipc.ist at gmail.com
Tue Dec 7 23:33:09 EST 2010
On Tue 07 Dec 2010 20:27 +0000, Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 December 2010 19:02:59 Xyne wrote:
> > Peter Lewis wrote:
> > > This means that we cannot override (A) in the rest of the byelaws. I can
> > > imagine that we might want to create something requiring (say) a 2/3rds
> > > majority for some type of serious proposal at some point... How about:
> > /snip
> > > Just more thoughts, trying to spot loopholes, etc... :-)
> > The formatting got mangled. The format was
> > The proposal is foo if EITHER
> > A) condition 1 OR
> > B) condition 2
> > UNLESS some other condition
> > The indentation should make it clear that the EITHER and UNLESS wrap
> > the two choices. If you have a better idea of how to "insert parentheses"
> > then let me know.
> Ah, thought so :-)
> > Here's version 3 again without wrapping, hopefully:
> Yeah, I don't have any better suggestion really, and apart from my general
> dislike for using whitespace to provide meaning (a la python) it's pretty
> clear to me.
I do like to separate words by a space and paragraphs by a blank line.
It makes text easier to read and understand. ;)
It's nice to see this getting some development now, but I think we
should make a final revision soon, so this doesn't end up in endless
discussion. It doesn't need to be perfect. Making it better than it was
is good too.
More information about the aur-general