[aur-general] [PATCH] tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure

Peter Lewis plewis at aur.archlinux.org
Wed Dec 8 10:27:19 EST 2010

On Wednesday 08 December 2010 15:23:01 Xyne wrote:
> I think the passage concerning "similar" proposals is too vague. There is
> no way to define those terms in a way that is unambiguous in all cases and
> trying to do so is futile and condemned to a pedantic spiral.
> I trust the human factor to handle those cases. People will be able to
> determine whether it's the same proposal or not.

Okay, I don't intend to push this. I just think it would be nice to avoid any 
ambiguity where someone says that we have to wait 3 months e.g. to amend 
quorum, since a proposal to do that just failed, even though the second 
proposal might be slightly different.

> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124479

I'm happy with that. Want to propose it then?


More information about the aur-general mailing list