[aur-general] [PATCH] tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure
louipc.ist at gmail.com
Wed Dec 8 19:42:20 EST 2010
On Wed 08 Dec 2010 16:23 +0100, Xyne wrote:
> I think the passage concerning "similar" proposals is too vague. There
> is no way to define those terms in a way that is unambiguous in all
> cases and trying to do so is futile and condemned to a pedantic
> I trust the human factor to handle those cases. People will be able to
> determine whether it's the same proposal or not.
> I've removed that passage, changed "bylaws" to "by-laws", and changed "YES /
> NO" to "YES or NO".
I would prefer the non hyphenated spelling. *shrug*
> As Loui pointed out, we should agree on a final version soon. I currently
> support this version:
Yeah we're starting to lump too many changes into one amendment.
More information about the aur-general