[aur-general] [PATCH] tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure

Peter Lewis plewis at aur.archlinux.org
Thu Dec 9 01:54:08 EST 2010

On Thursday 09 December 2010 00:45:33 Loui Chang wrote:
> On Wed 08 Dec 2010 11:59 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
> > > Let's wait another day to get some more comments and incorporate any
> > > last changes. If it changes during the discussion period without
> > > unanimous consent then we would end up in a grey area when deciding
> > > which version to vote on (and we're limited by YES/NO proposals...
> > > haha).
> > 
> > Also if we are putting stuff like five day discussion section, seven day
> > voting period, 66% quorum in the Standard Voting Procedure section, are
> > we going to remove the redundant information in the other sections? As
> > it stands now every section says 66% quorum. --Kaiting.
> I would leave them period, but definitely leave them for at least
> another amendment.

Indeed. In most of the democratic organisations I've worked with, we'd usually 
agree one thing we wanted to change, then take a look afterwards to see how / 
if this impacted on other things, and change them to be consistent if needed.


More information about the aur-general mailing list