[aur-general] TU application - Kyle Keen
louipc.ist at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 02:05:22 CET 2010
On Thu 09 Dec 2010 09:54 -0500, keenerd wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
> > The issue as I see it is that you presented the idea on this list for
> > discussion but didn't care to follow that discussion until a conclusion was
> > reached.
> It seemed discussion had petered out.
> > Some TUs objected to the bot and I think you should have taken those
> > objections into consideration (e.g. that icons should be tolerated, etc).
> In the days before the launch there were seven replies. Of these,
> three were positive and four were neutral. Not one negative comment
> or objection. (From just TUs: 1 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative.)
> All advice given in the neutral comments was applied. Tone of the
> message was greatly lightened in the case of icons. Silly workarounds
> like base64 were removed. No one commented on the number or choice of
> packages in the lists attached to the original post.
> I will look for stronger consensus in the future.
If in doubt start a vote. ;)
More information about the aur-general