[aur-general] trusted users business
ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org
Thu Jul 15 13:40:36 EDT 2010
On 07/15/10 12:57, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> Quoting the TU Bylaws Quote section:
> "This section deals with quorums, and the consequences for those that
> repeatedly keep the group from meeting them.
> Quorums were established to make sure that all TUs are having a say in
> the matters that they vote on, and to ensure that TUs remain active in
> the job that they have taken on. All active TUs should be
> participating in discussions and voting procedures in order to
> continue meeting the quorums.
> **For this reason, active TUs that keep quorum from being established
> on a voting procedure for three consecutive voting procedures (they
> need not be on the same motion) are automatically brought up for
> removal procedure, by reason of unwarranted inactivity. **"
> ...So IMO we should start a removalprocedure...
AFAICT, no vote-quorums have actually failed to be established in recent
history, so the above automatic-removal (**For this reason...**) clause
does not apply. (The general activity-guidelines found above it might,
More information about the aur-general