[aur-general] Packages that can be moved to aur
gostrc at gmail.com
Sat Jul 17 11:14:57 EDT 2010
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Laurent Carlier <lordheavym at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to start a talk about packages that can be moved to aur, for
> various reasons, not only because they are orphaned, but essencially due to
> lack of maintainance upstream.
> Feel free to comment and add other packages.
> Project seem dead upstream, better alternatives exist
> Depend on a cvs snapshot from 2007, not update for 3 years (project is dead ?)
> Similar to xf4vnc-xcliplistproto
> Binary only, x86 only (x86_64 with lib32), doesn't seem maintain upstream
grep -R pkgname /var/abs/community
for all of them and nothing depends on them.
I also think these should be removed.
More information about the aur-general