[aur-general] Opinions

[Nathan O.]

On 06/03/2010 12:49 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote:
> On 06/03/10 at 12:39am, Nathan O. wrote:
>    
>> Thanks for the reply, I figured it may be better just to do the app,
>> but also wondered if it would be good in case it gets moved
>> upstream.
>>
>> On 06/03/2010 12:41 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>      
>>> On 03/06/10 15:35, Nathan O. wrote:
>>>        
>>>> I was wanting to get people's opinion, anybody against packaging
>>>> $pkgname.desktop and icon for packages or would it be better to just
>>>> package the app.
>>>>
>>>> I tend to just package the app and that is it, but I thought I'd get
>>>> others opinion on this.
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> You can provide them if you want, but it is always better to get
>>> them included upstream.
>>>
>>> Allan
>>>
>>>        
>>      
> Generally, I try to use included .desktop files and icons. If none
> are included and it is a purely desktop app, then I'll include my
> own (after sending them upstream).
>    
Alot of the apps I have been working with doesn't have .desktop files