[aur-general] indigo

[Nathan O.]

Okay I will keep that in mind :)

On 06/03/2010 04:15 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 03/06/10 10:12, Nathan O. wrote:
>> On 06/03/2010 04:09 AM, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm K. Didn't know. I know personally I rather not package commercial
>>>> apps.
>>>
>>> Why not? If you bought commercial software it would be nice to install
>>> it as Arch Linux package.
>> I mean the purpose of AUR is to allow others to install it as well.
>> Chance that the creator of the software doesnt want it packaged, is what
>> I mean
>>
> AUR neither stores nor distribute packages. The wishes of the creators 
> in this case is therefore irrelevant, whether or the software is 
> Trialware(nothing wrong with this!) or Freeware.