ndowens04 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 3 05:17:41 EDT 2010
Okay I will keep that in mind :)
On 06/03/2010 04:15 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 03/06/10 10:12, Nathan O. wrote:
>> On 06/03/2010 04:09 AM, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
>>>> Hmm K. Didn't know. I know personally I rather not package commercial
>>> Why not? If you bought commercial software it would be nice to install
>>> it as Arch Linux package.
>> I mean the purpose of AUR is to allow others to install it as well.
>> Chance that the creator of the software doesnt want it packaged, is what
>> I mean
> AUR neither stores nor distribute packages. The wishes of the creators
> in this case is therefore irrelevant, whether or the software is
> Trialware(nothing wrong with this!) or Freeware.
More information about the aur-general