[aur-general] Orphan Request

arcpp.zju at gmail.com arcpp.zju at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 11:44:40 EST 2010

It is one week already.

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Ray Rashif <schivmeister at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/03/2010, Hilton Medeiros <medeiros.hilton at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I disagree. I believe the developer should have priority and be given
>> the ownership as soon as possible. You don't have to wait the
>> maintainer kiss good bye e hug the build. It is just a build script.
> I concur, but it's rude for us to just barge in like that. It's a
> simple matter between the developer and the buildscript maintainer, so
> it's best left up to them to contact each other, and then if the
> maintainer tries anything funny (or does not try anything at all) we
> disown it.
> A 7-day or next-weekend grace period is good for things like this (for
> the maintainer to respond to the orphan request). I had once orphaned
> a package for a developer who didn't even claim it (synfig*), but it
> took me a while before I read and replied to the e-mail outlining a
> build-related matter.
> --

More information about the aur-general mailing list