[aur-general] Convention question

Stephen Weinberg stephen at q5comm.com
Mon May 31 11:39:32 EDT 2010


On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:13:48 +0300
Ionut Biru <biru.ionut at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 05/31/2010 06:11 PM, Stephen Weinberg wrote:
> > I was making my first svn package and I used some examples I found
> > online. The abiword-svn package removes the svn directory at the
> > end of the package build. Is that the correct thing to do? It does
> > not make sense to me.
> >
> > The abiword package is at
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34444
> >
> > And the new package I created is at
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37712
> >
> > -- Stephen
> 
> the convention is in /usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD-svn.proto
> 
> that file is owned by abs
> 

I know. I read that when making mine. I am wondering why that package
deletes the source when it is done with it. It makes more sense to
update the svn when you rebuild the package instead of redownloading
the whole thing.


More information about the aur-general mailing list