[aur-general] [community] PKGBUILDs incompatible with sourcing

Ray Rashif schiv at archlinux.org
Tue Oct 5 06:46:37 EDT 2010


On 5 October 2010 12:22, Sergej Pupykin <ml at sergej.pp.ru> wrote:
>  On 05.10.2010 01:04, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>
>> I'm not filing (a) bug(s) for these since there's no harm done, but
>> this should serve as a reminder to everyone that we should check our
>> buildscripts for sourcing compatibility whenever possible, for the
>> sake of clarity and consistency. The currently affected PKGBUILDs are
>> as follows:
>>
>> ./community/perl-datetime/PKGBUILD
>> bash: printf: 0,61: invalid number
>>
>> ./community/perl-parse-recdescent/PKGBUILD
>> bash: printf: 1,965001: invalid number
>>
> Most of "invalid number" issues already fixed in svn by something like:
> LC_NUMERIC=C
> provides=("perl-datetime=`printf %.4f $pkgver`")
> or
> provides=("perl-datetime=`LC_NUMERIC=C printf %.4f $pkgver`")
>>
>> ./community/haskell-x11/PKGBUILD
>> error: package "ghc" not found
>>
>> ./community/haskell-x11-xft/PKGBUILD
>> error: package "ghc" not found
>>
>> For the perl packages:
>>
>> provides=("perl-datetime=`printf %.4f ${pkgver/./,} | sed 's#,#.#'`")
>>
>> I don't know what the intention is with ${pkgver/./,} | sed 's#,#.#'
>> but it does not work, as it's replacing "." with "," and then back to
>> ".", but printf naturally fails to deal with the decimal being
>> replaced by a comma. If I understood this correctly, the line should
>> read:
>>
>> provides=("perl-datetime=$(printf "%.4f %s\n" ${pkgver})")
>>
>> For the other two:
>>
>> _ghcver=`pacman -Q ghc | cut -d\  -f 2 | cut -f 1 -d -`
>> depends=("ghc=${_ghcver}" 'libx11')
>
> "package not found" error does not prevent source package building and can
> be ignored. Probably I should replace it with:
>
> _ghcver=`pacman -Q ghc 2>/dev/null | cut -d\  -f 2 | cut -f 1 -d -`
>
>
>> Again, I don't know why go through the trouble of checking a local
>> package that may not exist on all systems (Sergej?). Better "hardcode"
>> the numbers and be done with it.
>
> It is easier to use automatic version checking.

OK, thanks for attending to those!


More information about the aur-general mailing list