[aur-general] Orphaning request

[José Valecillos]

  On 10/05/2010 01:19 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Am 05.10.2010 17:40, schrieb Adam Hani Schakaki:
>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500
>> Thomas Dziedzic<gostrc at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki<arch at krzd.net>  wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500
>>>> Thomas Dziedzic<gostrc at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki<arch at krzd.net>  wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> please orphan go-openoffice-el [1] and go-openoffice-es [2] since those are outdated for a long time but don't get updated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adam Hani Schakaki
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27124
>>>>>> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26321
>>>>>>
>>>>> Did you try contacting the maintainers?
>>>> Shouldn't they get an information if someone flags their package out of date? If not, I will try to contact them.
>>>> I don't think that they didn't manage to update it since only the version number needs to be changed.
>>>>
>>>> Adam Hani Schakaki
>>>>
>>> Usually I only orphan a package if the maintainer has been contacted
>>> by someone and they still haven't updated it.
>>> There could be many reasons as to why they didn't update (like
>>> forgetting), which is why I prefer friendly reminders first :)
>> Go-openoffice-el was already orphaned by Andrea Scarpino. I wrote an email on Sep 25, but got no answer until now. So I think go-openoffice-es can be orphaned, or not?
>>
>> Adam Hani Schakaki
>>
> Let's give him another week or so.
>
> Regards Stefan
I already did a comment on that package of how must be updated 
(jvalecillos user). The mantainer did never reply me. If you get adopt 
the packages, please consider that recommendations that i wrote.