[aur-general] Libreoffice in AUR

Stefan Husmann stefan-husmann at t-online.de
Thu Oct 14 03:14:55 EDT 2010

Am 14.10.2010 08:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
> I just noticed that libreoffice-new has been uploaded. Contrary to the
> last post in https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105664 the old
> libreoffice in the AUR has not yet (to my searching) been deleted (I
> think its been reuploaded). Obviously, its exactly the same.
> I wonder what the point is of having libreoffice-new though. It's
> basically just extracting of some rpms, as compared to the libreoffice
> from [testing].
> I propose that libreoffice[1] and libreoffice-new[2] be deleted. The
> author should reupload as libreoffice-bin. If a TU agrees, I volunteer
> to email the author.
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41792
> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41793

I deleted libreoffice again because of the name clash. But in the past 
we allowed binary versions or beta versions of some projects, so why not 
doing here?

I would not recommend its usage, but let people decide.

Regards Stefan

More information about the aur-general mailing list