[aur-general] Libreoffice in AUR
stefan-husmann at t-online.de
Thu Oct 14 03:36:20 EDT 2010
Am 14.10.2010 09:27, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 09:14 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
>> Am 14.10.2010 08:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
>>> I just noticed that libreoffice-new has been uploaded. Contrary to the
>>> last post in https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105664 the old
>>> libreoffice in the AUR has not yet (to my searching) been deleted (I
>>> think its been reuploaded). Obviously, its exactly the same.
>>> I wonder what the point is of having libreoffice-new though. It's
>>> basically just extracting of some rpms, as compared to the libreoffice
>>> from [testing].
>>> I propose that libreoffice and libreoffice-new be deleted. The
>>> author should reupload as libreoffice-bin. If a TU agrees, I volunteer
>>> to email the author.
>>>  http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41792
>>>  http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41793
>> I deleted libreoffice again because of the name clash. But in the past
>> we allowed binary versions or beta versions of some projects, so why not
>> doing here?
>> I would not recommend its usage, but let people decide.
>> Regards Stefan
> I was just thinking the name is misleading, and -bin is a better name.
Yes this is a discussable point.
More information about the aur-general