[aur-general] Libreoffice in AUR

[Stefan Husmann]

Am 14.10.2010 09:51, schrieb Vitaliy Berdinskikh UR6LAD:
> Hi all!
> 
>> Am 14.10.2010 09:27, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
>>> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 09:14 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
>>>> Am 14.10.2010 08:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
>>>>> I just noticed that libreoffice-new has been uploaded. Contrary to the
> ...
>>>>> I propose that libreoffice[1] and libreoffice-new[2] be deleted. The
>>>>> author should reupload as libreoffice-bin. If a TU agrees, I volunteer
>>>>> to email the author.
> ...
>>>>>
> ...
>>>> I would not recommend its usage, but let people decide.
> ...
>>>
>>> I was just thinking the name is misleading, and -bin is a better name.
> ...
>> Yes this is a discussable point.
> 
> Can I upload libreoffice (3.3.0-beta not 3.2.99) to AUR?
> Who can explain?
> 
> --
> Less QRM more DX
> Vitaliy Berdinskikh
> 
> -- реклама -----------------------------------------------------------
> Три новые линейки хостинг-планов - всё что нужно Вашему сайту!
> 6 месяцев хостинга бесплатно и домен в подарок. http://Hvosting.ua
> 
> 

Hello,

not under that name. If you do not compile from sources, use libreoffice-bin.

-beta was my first choice, but -bin is imho better.

Regards Stefan