[aur-general] Libreoffice in AUR
lists at baums-on-web.de
Wed Oct 20 10:03:42 EDT 2010
Am Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:50:53 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org>:
> On 20/10/10 23:47, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > So I'd like to see LibreOffice in [extra] besides OpenOffice. I
> > think LibreOffice is or will soon be too important to just have it
> > in AUR or [community].
> Wow... that was fast:
> > pacman -Si libreoffice
> Repository : extra
> Name : libreoffice
> Version : 126.96.36.199-1
Do you mean my comment or the including to [extra] yesterday?
Somehow I must have missed this. In the pacman -Ss resp. clyde -Ss
output I've only seen the AUR packages.
But then the AUR packages should probably be cleaned up.
But isn't the version in [extra] out-of-date?
From the PKGBUILD:
_LOver=188.8.131.52 # = 3.3-alpha1
Latest version is 3.3.0-beta2.
Or am I missing something again?
And why does libreoffice conflict with openoffice-base? Is it a
packaging or an upstream issue?
More information about the aur-general