[aur-general] Status of community cleanup 2010.

Thomas Dziedzic gostrc at gmail.com
Wed Sep 1 19:07:44 EDT 2010


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:31 AM, bardo <ilbardo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2010/8/30 Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com>:
>>>> mt-daapd        x86_64          Community       orphan
>>>
>>> This one works, and as far as I have seen it won't get any more
>>> releases, but it also will work indefinitely. The stable branch is
>>> long time dead, and svn seems too, but the svn head is very stable
>>> (been using it for a few months). The project has been renamed to
>>> Firefly (http://www.fireflymediaserver.org/), but the download page
>>> still points to the mt-daapd sourceforge tarballs.
>>>
>>> Conclusions: if anyone wants to adopt it, it seems to be in a good
>>> state and needs zero maintenance. After using it for a good while on
>>> my server, I'd also switch to the svn head (check mt-daapd-svn in the
>>> AUR for any differences). Otherwise, drop it! =)
>>>
>>> Corrado
>>>
>>
>> removed:
>> miniracer
>> grub-gfx
>> noyau
>> premake
>> mt-daapd
>> qucs
>>
>> left to do:
>> emerald-themes          Community       ronald
>> pstreams        Community       dgriffiths
>>
>> Lets get these 2 rebuilt!!! Sooo close.
>>
>
> Just rebuilt pstreams..
>
> I think we should drop emerald-themes, I haven't followed compiz dev,
> but emerald-themes hasn't been updated since 2007 (or any new code in
> git since then)
>

Another reason to drop it (conversation in #compiz)

2010-09-01 18:03:30	coz_	td123,  if you want more emerald themes you
should probaby go to  gnome-look.org and download them
2010-09-01 18:03:46	td123	coz_: I'm more interested in the status, I
don't use it :)
2010-09-01 18:03:57	td123	coz_: why would anyone want to use it
2010-09-01 18:04:30	coz_	td123,  :)   well it does have a few nice
options but it is essentially badly coded ... I believe someone tried
to rewrited in for compiz ++  but I have not tired it
2010-09-01 18:04:45	soreau	td123: No one has worked on it for a long
time now and it isnt supported at all officially
2010-09-01 18:04:56	soreau	It just happens to still work
2010-09-01 18:05:07	coz_	td123,  a long while back ...a new decorator
was discussed for about 15 minutes :)
2010-09-01 18:05:40	coz_	td123,  but right now gtk window decorator
and kde4 window decorator are essentially all there is
2010-09-01 18:05:52	td123	ok, thanks :)


More information about the aur-general mailing list