[aur-general] wwt-svn and wit-svn

[Evangelos Foutras]

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Antonio Lucas <antonioluccas at gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> wwt-svn[1] and wit-svn[2] are the same package. Both maintainers are active,
> and both packages get the latest version from svn of this package (even the
> packages containing a version on them).
> what do you guys do in this situations?
>
>
> <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504>[1]
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34239
> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37504
>
> abracos
> Antonio Lucas

I'm not sure which package should go; wit-svn has a more correct name,
but wwt-svn was uploaded first and has more votes.

I'm CC'ing the respective maintainers so they can decide which package
we should keep. :]