[aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth
lolilolicon at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 09:10:09 EDT 2011
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, talki walki <lolilolicon at gmail.com> wrote:
> ruby-sqlite3: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3
> sqlite3-ruby: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3-ruby
> I don't think these two gems are the same one.
Sorry for double posting again... For the sake of completeness: I
checked the AUR comments of ruby-sqlite3 and found this:
> 'sqlite3-ruby' is now an empty placeholder gem that depends on 'sqlite3'.
Nevertheless, I still believe a gem named `foo-ruby' can be completely
different from a gem named `foo'. The convention should not make an
exception just for gems with a -ruby suffix.
More information about the aur-general