[aur-general] Flash 10.1 and kernel26 packages

[gadget3000]

By the looks of it both flashplugins are used by devs for testing their
flash apps on older versions of flash. Neither are considered popular but
both have a use so I vote that they should stay.

As for the kernel26 packages I don't know how it worked in the past with
kernel24 packages but I think a month after the movement of linux from
testing to core seems a reasonable amount of time before deleting them.
Ultimately it's up to the TU's though.

Gadget3000



On 15 August 2011 15:52, Det <nimetonmaili at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12.8.2011 19:12, Det wrote:
>
>> Hi all you electronic mail readers,
>>
>> There was some talk some time ago I think concerning the removal of the
>> Flash10.1 packages. I thought I'd bring it back up. Here are the links:
>>
>> flashplugin-10.1: http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=47029<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47029>
>> lib32-flashplugin10.1: http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49982<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49982>
>>
>> Then another thing is those kernel26- packages (all 59 of 'em). Is there
>> some deadline until all the ones that hasn't been updated or converted into
>> linux- alternatives should be removed?:
>>
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?K=kernel26&SeB=n&**PP=100<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=kernel26&SeB=n&PP=100>
>>
>>  Thanks, byyye
>>  Det
>>
>> End of electronic guru mail.
>>
> This is a tricky one I know. What about just the Flash10.1 packages?
>
>