[aur-general] Deletion Request southerncross-git and mcabber duplicates

[nem]

good day.

two weeks ago southerncross github was deleted due halt of development
(see reference in [1]). it was orphaned upon and since then nobody came
up with a mirror (even though removal was announced 6 weeks ago). so i
guess 'southerncross-git' [2] is redundant for now and can be removed.

[1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=956445#p956445
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48743

also there are some duplicates of 'mcabber-hg' (which is the
source-version of mcabber in [community]) which can be deleted:
'mcabber-devel' [3] is orphaned and flagged out of date for 6 months.
'mcabber-crew-hg' [4] is simply a duplicate. 'mcabber-lm-hg' [5] is
outdated (sources are 404). i contacted the maintainer (see mail below)
and he agreed for removal of both of his packages, too ([4] and [5]).

[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26896
[4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31147
[5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26570

regards,
nem

> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:28:28 +0400 Николай Степаненко
> <nixtrian at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Keep mcabber-hg. This is a development version (builds from
> mercurial as seen from package name). *-crew and *-lm can be deleted.
> 
> 2011/8/16, nem <nem at ikitten.co.uk>:
> >
> > hej!
> >
> > i saw that three of your packages in the AUR are basically the same
> > of which one is already outdated, too.
> >
> > mcabber-lm-hg [1] is outdated (404).
> > mcabber-crew-hg [2] and mcabber-hg [3] are basically the same
> > (different repo).
> > i find all PKGBUILDS redundant because mcabber is in [community]
> > and up to date. is there any reason to keep them in AUR?
> >
> > regards,
> > nem
> >
> > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26570
> > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31147
> > [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26873
> >
>