[aur-general] Deletion Requests
gadget3000
gadget3000 at msn.com
Mon Aug 29 07:49:04 EDT 2011
>
> One other thing. The votes are meant for having a package moved to
> [community] and not for having it kept in AUR. The minimum of required
> votes are 10 as far as I know. So a package with 7 votes is not that
> far away from that.
Ah, I thought it was 20 votes but with a bit of wiki searching that was
apparently an old minimum. I usually quote the votes because "Votes are an
indicator of package interest or usage." (Source:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community#Minimum_Vote_Requirement). I
guess the key word in that sentence is indicator!
Do any pages of definitive rules/guidelines exist?
Thanks,
Gadget3000
On 29 August 2011 12:17, Heiko Baums <lists at baums-on-web.de> wrote:
> Am Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:59:06 +0100
> schrieb gadget3000 <gadget3000 at msn.com>:
>
> > I don't think I flagged either package out of date but either way
> > thanks for letting me know about old projects. I'm still a bit of a
> > noob here :P
>
> I don't know who has flagged this package as out-of-date, but it was.
> So I mentioned it.
>
> This button is abused quite often. Unfortunately there are some people
> who regularly flag a package as out-of-date just because they think
> there are bugs in the PKGBUILD and they are just waiting for a new
> version of the PKGBUILD - so they misuse it as their personal bug
> tracker - or in this case because they probably think that a package is
> "too" old for their taste.
>
> > I do have a question though. What if it's an old
> > multiplayer only project? I nobody plays it, nobody will want to use
> > it.
>
> I guess, if the servers aren't accessible anymore then this game can be
> considered as unusable anymore. So I guess it won't work anymore
> except if there's also a single player mode.
>
> One other thing. The votes are meant for having a package moved to
> [community] and not for having it kept in AUR. The minimum of required
> votes are 10 as far as I know. So a package with 7 votes is not that
> far away from that.
>
> Heiko
>
>
More information about the aur-general
mailing list