On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Jookia <166291 at gmail.com> wrote: > Uhh, not to be a bother, but it seems by uqm-new package is gone, yet the > uqm package is still old. Any explanation would be appreciated. > It was probably deleted as a duplicate, because you should update the original package rather then creating a new package.