[aur-general] Cross-compilers naming scheme

Patrick Buddeberg perchy22 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 17 19:10:27 EST 2011

>     Probably as good as second option, but cross prefix is annoying me.> I'm slightly more of a fan of number 1, since these are variants of
> the application, but I think its better just to get one naming
> standard and stick to it than to have something that everybody likes.
> The difference between 1 and 2 makes it just a matter of which feels
> nicer; both are easy to search for.

I would say that there is already a defacto standard setup from
multilib: lib32-$appname.

(Just installed a bunch of stuff from there to play Portal... :)


More information about the aur-general mailing list