[aur-general] AUR & Copyright

Sebastian Wiesner lunaryorn at googlemail.com
Mon Feb 7 05:22:21 EST 2011

2011/2/7 Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky at gmail.com>:
> I think Creative Commons is a good choice for PKGBUILDs in AUR. It can
> be almost as permissible as public domain while still valid in most
> jurisdictions (actually I don't know any where it isn't).

Creative Commons itself does not recommend CC licences for software
[1], and – being written in bash – PKGBUILDs arguably qualify as

[1] http://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ#Can_I_use_a_Creative_Commons_license_for_software.3F

More information about the aur-general mailing list