[aur-general] TU Application -Thomas Hatch
Thomas S Hatch
thatch45 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 5 16:21:45 EST 2011
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Isaac Dupree <
> ml at isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote:
>> On 01/05/11 13:55, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>>> If you have any questions about MooseFS feel free to ask me, it has been
>>> amazing application for my company!
>> While we're asking, any thoughts about Tahoe-LAFS? - distributed,
>> fault-tolerant AND with quite thought-out encryption.
>> http://tahoe-lafs.org/ Googling suggests to me that it doesn't have its
>> own FUSE but it is sometimes combined with sshfs (that's possible since
>> Tahoe-LAFS provides an SFTP interface, among other interfaces).
> Ah yes Tahoe, I didn't spend as much time with this one, but it
> looks promising! In my tests MooseFS was faster and the failure support was
> a bit better, I would have to really dig into my note to remember exactly
> what it was that turned me off on it.
> I remember it being fairly nice though! I will have to play with it some
Oh, it is lower on my list, but I wanted to make SELinux more powerful in
Arch too, I am one of the VERY few who not only know how to handle SELinux,
and likes to use it :)
More information about the aur-general