[aur-general] delete request

Ng Oon-Ee ngoonee at gmail.com
Mon Jan 10 19:25:39 EST 2011


On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 17:01 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella at archlinux.us>wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > 2011/1/10 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric at gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella <
> > bradfanella at archlinux.us
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher
> > >> > <paterbrown at silberhelme.de> wrote:
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > > can somebody delete this packages...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > 1) obsolete
> > >> > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068
> > >> > > the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > 2) duplicate
> > >> > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238
> > >> > > the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > Done and done. Thank you. :-D
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> > Brad
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> What was the name of these packages ?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Cédric Girard
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the
> > > names?
> > >
> > > -Tom Hatch
> > >
> >
> > Um...uh...
> >
> > I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were
> > obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.
> >
> 
> Heh, I am not worried about harm, just curious!
> Congrats on being so fast on the draw!

On a related note: don't you guys
sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)



More information about the aur-general mailing list