[aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Discussion Period

[Thorsten Töpper]

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:19:28 +0000 Peter Lewis
<plewis at aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 12 December 2010 03:21:30 Xyne wrote:
> > The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section
> > of the TU bylaws:
> > 
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124557
> > 
> > The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list.
> > Briefly, these include:
> > * enabling a vote to pass in the absence of quorum when more than
> > 50% of active TUs have voted YES
> > * enabling a vote to fail in the absence of quorum when 50% or more
> > of active TUs have voted NO
> > * clarifying the text to eliminate ambiguities
> > 
> > Please see Kaiting's "[aur-general]Amendment" thread and Loui's
> > "[aur-general][PATCH]tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure"
> > thread for more details.
> > 
> > This message marks the beginning of the 5-day discussion period
> > before the amendment is put to a vote.
> 
> Are we voting on this then?

I guess we should, let's vote for another one to agree before starting
one and do a mistake with that ;-)

-- 
Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/
Key: 295AFBF4     FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 222 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20110111/5ce2b365/attachment.asc>