[aur-general] Python 3
matthias at maennich.net
Fri Jan 21 08:37:35 EST 2011
2011/1/21 Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca>:
> I'm replying because this is tangential... why don't we specify "python3"
> instead of "python" as a dep to make packages future-proof? Even if Python 4
> doesn't come out for a decade or more, it just seems that it would be logically
this idea came up last year.
Unfortunately this thread has not been continued.
Since this is a problem for any major release of central dependencies
we should think of a naming policy to avoid transition problems.
More information about the aur-general