[aur-general] python renaming

[Hector Martinez-Seara]

Yes, I completely agree. Python Packages are right now a mess.
Hector

On 19 June 2011 09:08, Axilleas P <markeleas at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just yesterday I adopted python-jinja2 [1].
> There are also two other similar packages. One is python-jinja1 [2]
> and python3-jinja2 [3], relying on python2 and python3 respectively.
> So, my question is, shouldn't packages depended on python2 be renamed
> accordingly? In this case [1][2] to python2-jinja1/2 and [3] to just
> python-jinja2?
>
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41497
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26870
> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38651
>
>
> --
> (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
> (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
> (> <) come join the dark side.
> /_|_\ (we have cookies.)
>



-- 
Hector Martínez-Seara Monné
mail: hseara at gmail.com
Tel: +34656271145
Tel: +358442709253