[aur-general] python renaming

[Jelle van der Waa]

On 06/19/2011 11:11 AM, Axilleas P wrote:
> I don't know if the renaming patch was applied to AUR and if it's
> possible to just rename the packages or they have to be deleted and be
> uploaded again though. Let a TU tell us.
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara
> <hseara at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Yes, I completely agree. Python Packages are right now a mess.
>> Hector
>>
>> On 19 June 2011 09:08, Axilleas P<markeleas at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Just yesterday I adopted python-jinja2 [1].
>>> There are also two other similar packages. One is python-jinja1 [2]
>>> and python3-jinja2 [3], relying on python2 and python3 respectively.
>>> So, my question is, shouldn't packages depended on python2 be renamed
>>> accordingly? In this case [1][2] to python2-jinja1/2 and [3] to just
>>> python-jinja2?
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41497
>>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26870
>>> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38651
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
>>> (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
>>> (>  <) come join the dark side.
>>> /_|_\ (we have cookies.)
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hector Martínez-Seara Monné
>> mail: hseara at gmail.com
>> Tel: +34656271145
>> Tel: +358442709253
>>
>
>
We Can't rename packages

-- 
Jelle van der Waa