[aur-general] python renaming

[Ray Rashif]

On 19 June 2011 21:09, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the solution is to be *very* consistent with packages names
> whatever the situation of the python3 version is right now.
> In other words: pick a guideline and stick to it. If
> python2-X/python-X is the way to go, no matter there is a python3
> package or not, use this convention...

Correct. However, with a previous discussion [1] and a bug report [2]
lingering I think most of us are hesitant to make a move. Maybe we're
just hoping for someone to step up with a mighty roar and set the
record straight.

[1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-April/019958.html
[2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23139


--
GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10