[aur-general] Package Guidelines: Naming of Apache mods

Phillip Smith lists at fukawi2.nl
Mon Jun 27 01:59:24 EDT 2011

Hi all,

My Google-fu has turned up nothing on this this. Is there a preferred
standard for naming packages of Apache mods? I see everything in [extra] is
just "mod_name" but some AUR packages are "apache-mod_name"

Personally I prefer the "apache-mod_name" form, but I take the format of
[extra] to be the official word? It doesn't seem to have been discussed
before (as best I can find in my searching) so thought I would raise it.

I have packages in AUR using both formats and I want to bring them in line
with "the right way", whichever that is ;)


More information about the aur-general mailing list