[aur-general] FYI: New packages have to be signed

[Thomas Bächler]

Am 01.11.2011 19:05, schrieb Kwpolska:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Smartboy <smartboyathome at gmail.com>
> wrote:> Just wondering, as a user, does this mean Pacman will now
> complain if one> builds and installs unsigned packages from the AUR?

The default SigLevel is "Optional" for now. This should be changed to
"PackageRequired" or "Required" IMO, but then you can't install unsigned
packages with pacman -U any more. Maybe pacman -U --no-signature should
exist.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20111102/ecf97503/attachment.asc>